Shhhh! Digital Media - Home of Butterfly Dragon, Tales Of The Sanctum: A Lady's Prerogative, The Two Dragons, The Two Butterflies, We Who Stand On Guard, Night Boat, The Legendary of Xarn. This content is written and created by Brian Joseph Johns and is all produced in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at 200 Sherbourne Street Suite 701 since April of 2012 (when we were called Poetry and Fiction). In 2014, I rebranded this site and hence Shhhh! Digital Media was born.
- Entry Point
- Tales of the Sanctum: A Lady's Prerogative [May 9, 2026!]
- The Butterfly Dragon [April 8, 2026!]
- Grand Tapestry [May 9, 2026!]
- Aliens: Aeternity [Updated Apr 7, 2026]
- Audiobooks
- Aerth Mother Animation Download
- Shhhh! Digital Media Watch Party Channel
- Credits And Site Wide Disclaimer
- About And Contact - Shhhh! Digital Media...
- The Last Lonely Lounge Comic
- Downloads [April 8, 2026!]
- Music
- Synphaera
- Support Us
Terms And Conditions
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
I am Not A Supporter of "Blow"...
Sunday, July 19, 2026
Heads Up...
Precedent in Canadian Law
- The Case: The defendant carried out a massive, coordinated cyber-stalking and harassment campaign over several decades targeting dozens of victims, their families, and associates. The objective was to completely dismantle the victims' actual identities and reputations, replacing them online with false profiles accusing them of being fraudsters, pedophiles, and criminals. [1, 2, 3, 4]
- The Legal Precedent: Recognizing that traditional defamation law was inadequate for an attack designed to "terrorize" and erase a person's digital identity, the court formally established a brand-new civil law precedent: the tort of harassment in internet communications. The court ruled that when an attack is systemic, malicious, and designed to strip a victim of their safety and identity, direct injunctive relief—such as transferring ownership of the fraudulent online assets to the victims—is warranted. [1, 2, 3]
- The Precedent: High-profile litigation involving groups like the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Church of Scientology has tested the boundaries of human rights laws. In cases like A.A. v. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, individuals argue that the coordinated community practice of "disfellowshipping" essentially erases their identity, cutting them off from family, businesses, and their entire social support network.
- The Court's Stance: Under modern human rights frameworks, courts face a complex balancing act. While human rights laws protect an individual's right to freedom and dignity, they also protect a religious group's freedom of association and autonomy over their internal membership. Generally, civil courts will not intervene in a religious group's decision to socially excommunicate someone unless it directly breaches a secular contract or results in distinct tortious harm (like intentional infliction of mental distress or physical intimidation). [1, 2]
- The Legal Framework: Under laws established in the 1990s (such as the UK’s Protection from Harassment Act 1997 or Canada's 1993 Criminal Harassment statutes), a perpetrator can be held liable even if they do not execute all the harassment themselves. If a group or ringleader coordinates a web of community members to constantly monitor, follow, or orchestrate hostile environments for a victim, the law treats this as a coordinated criminal conspiracy. [1, 2, 3, 4]
- Dismissal for Lack of Objective Evidence: When individuals file lawsuits alleging that an entire community, a secret society, or coordinated local networks are systematically tracking them and trying to overwrite their identity, courts historically view these claims unfavourably. [1]
- The Precedent Case: In Chowdhury v. Toronto Police Services Board (2018 ONSC 3587), an applicant alleged a massive, community-wide "gang stalking" campaign involving 24-hour surveillance and coordination among neighbors and police. The court dismissed the application on procedural grounds, citing a complete lack of objective, verifiable evidence linking the alleged participants to a coordinated conspiracy. [1, 2]
- The Evidentiary Burden: Under modern jurisprudence, for a court to recognize a coordinated community attack, the plaintiff must provide concrete digital or physical forensic footprints (e.g., IP addresses, intercepted communications, physical logs, or testimonies) proving a conspiracy exists. Without it, the legal system struggles to differentiate systemic community harassment from unprovable claims. [1]
Friday, July 17, 2026
Here's One Last Insight...
What I find is that society generally makes its own enemies. That people and various groups craft them specifically to crush them in order to validate and hide its own worst tendencies, while celebrating crushing people under foot.
I'm definitely not giving up or throwing in the towel. I'm just no longer going to share what I shared before, because it wasn't appreciated, and because there are abusive social ideologies that attempt to take the work and effort of others and attribute it to people that have nothing to do with it. Society has become a very toxic and corrupt place unfortunately. Very shallow too.
Its like most people are appealing to a sort of game show mentality, where most people are competing destructively for the amusement of some leviathan they've created, which essentially represents the entirety of the overall awareness of society. A leviathan that is entirely the sum of the social ego, and one that in terms of its propensity for taking action where justice is needed, is mostly impotent.
Its like an accident, on a crowded street, where someone suddenly falls unconscious, grasping at their chest and writhing in pain. Almost everyone sees it happening, and begins looking around, wondering when that leviathan is going to show up and help that person.
Nobody does a thing, but eventually someone in that crowd elects themselves to take action, perhaps performing CPR on the fallen person. It saves their life, and the person who performed the CPR then becomes a sort of circus freak. Elevated by society and a particular group.
The next day, the same thing happens again. Someone falls to the street grasping their chest, and writhing in pain. Everyone looks to that first person to take action the day before, which they do, but not before someone else tries to beat them to that person's assistance. The two stand off against each other, at the behest of the onlookers, who are cheering on a competition. A battle between these two would be takers of action, and one of them smites the other, and then helps the fallen citizen, performing CPR and saves them, becoming the circus freak themselves.
This continues until there are several of these people who take action, but most of whom have become circus freaks to the public, for amusement, and most people aren't concerned with saving the fallen citizens. They're now rallying behind their chosen circus freak, forming groups. These groups then go out and collectively and systematically crush the other competing circus freaks (the people who take action or provide insight into it), while the person needing saving on the ground is forced to wait until one of these groups and their chosen circus freak wins.
The effort to crush one another is always framed in the idea of someone of good moral direction and compass, and others whose motivations anything but virtuous. Truthfully though, it all comes down to the carefully planned and crafted public relations of their chosen circus freak, and the effort of their teams to discredit, provoke, manipulate and eventually crush their competition, while ensuring that the onlooking public never becomes aware of the dirty tricks that even the most "morally founded" circus freak is supposed to uphold. It all comes down to public relations, their ability to serve the illusion about their chosen circus freak, and their effectiveness at hiding what they don't want to public to find out about their personal lives, their conduct in competition against the other circus freaks, and their ability to hide the true nature of this game.
Society's focus is no longer on making a difference, but at harvesting the power and bling that arises from these competing circus freaks, who essentially were citizens who elected themselves to take action or provide an insight into taking action, when nobody else would.
Eventually, these dynamics become too much for these people, and they begin to oppose what society has become by speaking out against it and this vicious social game. The groups then work together to crush those people, and find new, naive and gullible people they've farmed into taking action with puppet strings, and situations they've created, for they're now trying to gain control of the entire show, at the expense of the fallen citizen that needs help that day, who essentially along with the latest circus freak puppet, is used to generate revenue for one of these competing groups, at the expense of the citizen needing help and the infamy arising from being one of the competitors.
Every time these groups crush another one of the circus freaks who eventually figured out what the hell was wrong, and spoke out against it, they cheer and celebrate their win over compassion and sensibility.
These "circus freaks" can never beyond that point, ever hope to have a normal life again. They're stalked, and harassed and are prevented from ever taking part in society ever again, except for the most basic of human rights, but only just barely. Some of them, like myself, used their position to try and make a difference, while those other teams did everything they could to silence me and crush me, while elevating their icons on the back of my efforts, and erasing my connection to my own efforts.
Eventually that entire modus operandi becomes the lure for the next generation of people who are puppeteered into taking action in a carefully scripted and controlled game, that most people seem to believe is simply the natural unfolding of reality.
The cause and effect of society without the foresight of planning of human intervention.
That is the illusion, and the belief that it isn't an illusion is what we refer to as innocence.
When the person who reveals that insight has spoken their last words on the matter, these groups begin fighting over the spotlight with their most current circus freak as their "icon", their first goal is to attribute that person's words to their icon, and erase the person from whom that insight truly originated in order to ensure that insight is always a brand of their team.
Welcome to the insight of Aldous Huxley, which has truly become our reality.
Brian Joseph Johns
When you fight for the rights of women and the autonomy of their own body, be sure that nobody has the right of retroactive abortion against the person who defends their rights. There's a good chance that their own mother will use that against them to erase them.
I'm not Polish by the way with all due respect.
Nobody is remotely controlling me at all. Including Melanie Jacob, Mario, Kevin Gross (or his brother Dwayne), Darren O'Brien (aka Snow), Michael Jacks, Ray Sare, Chris Ridding, Donald Sebastien Des Rosiers, John Paul Young, Reba (salvationist sextortionist), Rita Johns, Bob Federer, Rob Tozer, Guyanese Bobby, Doug, or anyone else for that matter.
I'm guessing that's likely the last of the corner stones.
Don't let anyone fool you into believing that if you step out beyond your own comfort zone, or skill set and aspire to learn something, and achieve something new involving a skill others believed that you didn't have, or that seems inconsistent with your own interests and history, that you are somehow being inauthentic. Caste systems, including those built by the Irish, as well as the Brahmins, gain power by convincing people that any step they make beyond their ascribed heritage and Church chosen path, is somehow breaking the way of things. Against the plan. Its the most effective way that people ensure that nobody else ever aspires to make them look bad by aiming higher than their own current position in life, because when someone aims higher, that sets the bar by which others around you will begin to judge themselves. It has nothing to do with you. Its all about them and how they feel about their own position in life. The truth is that they're the ones who need to deal with issues of authenticity, every time they see someone aiming higher than their own position in life. If the person who aims higher achieves their goals, then the person who doesn't will likely face their own issues for having tried to convince everyone not to step above their own position in life or away from the plan.
If you want a world where writers can only write about things directly related to their life and situation, then be prepared for a very limited perspective, and probably some very inventive and creative ways for overcoming that stifling of their right to artistic expression. In a world with enforced creative authenticity, women writers can only write women characters, who have all of the same qualities, and as much so, men can only write male characters of the same. Anything imagined beyond reality will have to be scrapped, including possibility and probability.
Authenticity is the most well masked form of narcissism there is. It forces artists to entirely be focused on the self, rather than developing empathy and compassion for the world around them by having to put themselves in the place of the people that exist whom they aren't, and the people they create in their art.
At a little over one year away from my retirement, I guess I'm going to be looking at one I'll be doing with the rest of my life. I don't think that it will involve taking a public (or private) beating again in the name of your game.
Oh, and I've never used cocaine or crack cocaine in my life, and I certain am not using now or ever into the future. I understand that there have been people in the spotlight who have lived their lives and run into situations where they were exposed to, or experimented with, during a very different day and age from the time we live in now, but most of those people have put that behind them, and would never want anyone to use their past, to justify their current activities in that regard. Most people who've had that experience, would rather press forward in life, keeping in mind what they've learned, and sticking in a direction that doesn't place themselves or others in the midst of such potential temptations and challenges.
I'm not a star or a celebrity (well at least I don't have a vast or even modest fortune from my body of work to rely upon), but I certainly do experience the weight quite often, but without the reward, and most of the credit for my work, and even the details of my existence are stolen from me. See my remarks about cults who swap identities between people operate in society. I think I have a positive balance at the bank right now that is less than a dollar, and a balance on my credit card that is probably under twenty cents. I do my best given trying circumstances that are no fault of my own to maintain a good budget, but its a challenge, and sometimes for the effort I put forth, I wonder if its all really worth it, because there has been no reward other than actually having done it, but even that as I stated, is stolen. When you make a true statement, when you hear someone else respond by saying "John paid" or "movie star paid" or "salvation paid", what they are saying is that your statement isn't yours. You're speaking from the input from someone else's mind or identity, and wearing it and their circumstances as if they were your own. The cult who operates that way, then gives even your expression to those people they claim you "paid". That's what those statements mean. They mean that you're not alive. You're just a copy of someone else's mind or experience. Like a mirror reflecting what someone else who has a real mind is thinking or doing. So claiming that any time you've expressed your own truth, that "John paid" or "Chuck paid" or "movie star paid" is their way of taking the credit for your words and thoughts, and giving them to those people as if it were part of the payment for some debt, which arose by the fact that this cult believe you don't have a mind, and that your thoughts and statements arose from whomever they claimed is "paid".
I'm neither a Jehovah's Witness or a member of Prince Hall, and never have been.
My name isn't Chuck, and I'm not a part of any religion or ideology that swaps identities between people.
I'm not a ghost, and not part of any religion that treats people as if they're ghosts. People who they treat as if they don't exist, except to steal from them their words and the credit for their actions.
I'll stick with Japan as my friend, along with Southeast Asia. I'm pretty good at standing against stalker scumbags, which is exactly what this stalking cult are amongst other things. Taking their garbage and transferring it to other people, using a variety of means that I'm going to be exposing over the next few weeks, in easy to understand and yet very detailed explanations of their methods.
I am Brian Joseph Johns and this is Shhhh! Digital Media at https://www.shhhhdigital.com or https://www.shhhhdigital.ca in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at 200 Sherbourne Street Suite 701.
Once again, I am not a member of Christianity with all due respect. I am not Jewish, and I am not Muslim, but I am not opposed to either of those two religions or any right to their beliefs. I am opposed to stalking groups that operate under the guidance of religions, or any other insurgent act to disrupt lives or to associate a person wrongfully with activity that has nothing to do with them or their life. I am not a member of the Salvation Army and never will be. I am completely opposed to religious groups whose soldiers stalk and harass members of society, take part in sextortion or attempt to transfer the responsibility for the history and actions of other people to substitutes: ie "lambs for the slaughter".
Nothing I've stated here in this post is a lie, though I did use an anecdote to describe at least some of the social dynamics of modern society that are making this world ever more similar to the fiction work of Aldous Huxley from his book Brave New World. I am not opposed to hedonism (in the sense of a loving couple enjoying the wonder of their shared time or even by one's self), but there are social boundaries for a reason, and that reason is because when the line is broken between neighbours, there are some who will attempt to claim your experiences, your output, your thoughts and dreams as their own, and some, many, especially of similar belief, will attempt to do so collectively and deny you of your own existence. Even couples can be subject to this sort of dilution of their being and experience nonconsensually by a group they made no attempt to join. I think Huxley's example however is in how the John the Savage becomes an icon of this society, and is exploited competitively as an icon, to the point that it becomes perilous. Especially in a world where there are so few personal boundaries.
I don't live or work in the shelter system thankfully, though I've experienced the very, very bottom and got close to the top, and both for a span of years of my life, and without the involvement of legal issues or narcotics. I don't play guitar and I've never owned a guitar in my life.
![]() |
| Click image for contact information... |
Thursday, July 16, 2026
Let My Guard Down, Attacked Again...
So, just to let you know that after that potentially optimistic post from yesterday, I was once again socially attacked in a fairly large and coordinated scale. As a result, I've decided to delay posting any new stories or episodes for week or two. Maybe longer.
I'll try to post some short interesting topics, but I won't be focusing on Butterfly Dragon Reimagined, Era of the Spellbound or Grand Tapestry of Moments for a considerable span of time, as I need to recover. Its gets harder to bounce back as you get older.
Thank you for reading my content here at Shhhh! Digital Media. In the interest of truth and clarity, I am not a guitar player and have never owned a guitar in my life. Unfortunately there are others who've been creating a lie that I'm a very different person than in reality. None of my content currently here is created at Heyworth House Dixon Hall Co-ed Shelter which is also nicknamed "Zoo", after the fact that it used to be called Zoo Bar. Before that, it was called Spectrum. That location is used as a center of the battle between old school colour symbolism (ROYGBIV) and new school colour symbolism (RBB). I don't take part in that activity at all. I believe that colour symbolism when used in that capacity is just a means of tricking you into creating the bars of your own prison.
I am not from Nova Scotia, and Shhhh! Digital Media as a business operates from 200 Sherbourne Street Suite 701 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and has since April of 2012, though officially under an Ontario Business Number at that time. My name isn't Michael, nor is it Shane, nor is it Chuck, nor is it Bobby. I'm not Polish, or Irish or Scottish with all due respect, though each of those culture are unique and have a vast and distinct history to have arrived here at this point, from so long ago.
Not a fraud by the way.
I am Brian Joseph Johns and this is Shhhh! Digital Media at https://www.shhhhdigital.com or https://www.shhhhdigital.ca in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at 200 Sherbourne Street Suite 701.
I'm not "Frenchie" aka Donald Sebastien Des Rosiers.
I don't live in the United States, and I'm neither Trump nor Obama. Obama and Trump literally screwed over a Chinese female business executive as a tag team, over two different terms. The laws to trap Meng Wanzhou were put in place by the Obama administration, while they were employed by the Trump administration in such a way that made Canada appear the bad guy, by using our extradition treaty with the United States to put us in the horrible position of arresting a female executive and confining her to a residence in Canada for a year and a half.
I'm aware that's old news, and that the American people aren't directly responsible for those policies, and likely had they known how it would be used to target a woman, probably would have stood both administrations down and called for an oversight hearing.
Don't let politics polarize you. You're all part of the same country. Your officials should never exploit a divide in racial, religious or especially gender demographics. Bifurcation is the worst political trick in the history of electoral politics, and one of the greatest obstacles to peace.
I live and vote in Canada, and when that situation occurred, I was one of the first people to write a letter to the Prime Minister in her defense, even having gathered all the information related to the actual international laws and agreements the Obama administration put into place without the agreement of the United Nations, in order to bully the rest of the world not to do business with Iran.
And then years later, it was used to force Canadians to arrest a Chinese woman. You have a say, America. Don't let that happen, and don't let your elected officials put forth politics that can be used to exploit the divisions in society, that in the end cost a woman more than a year of her freedom.
No blue team or brown team for me. I say what I mean and mean what I say. I've decided that I'm most likely going to quit writing. I'm not sure where that will leave Shhhh! Digital Media for now, but I'll be sure to update you when I decide. I think it would be a smart idea not to continue sharing when it just leads to more abuse, and harassment. I'm certain you'll find whatever it is that I have to offer in other people.
I'm not a blue rose or a hell's angel or a panther, and my own love interest isn't Filipino or named Louise. No blue star for me. Hate isn't love and love isn't hate. I'm not a member of Christianity or a member of the Salvation Army and never will be. I am not a guitar player and have never owned a guitar in my life.
![]() |
| Click image for contact information... |
Wednesday, July 15, 2026
Follow Up And Updates
Hello again, my fellow readers and sojourners into the wonderful world of fantasy and science. Its Brian Joseph Johns here and I'm looking to follow up a couple of posts I recently took offline, though not for any reasons to do with redaction or back-stepping on my expression, because that is definitely not the case at all.
In today's world, especially for those who are of some renown or infamy for one reason or another, usually to do with their performance arts, their creative endeavors or their outspoken views, and certainly more often than not, all three combined, when we try to express ideas that are coming from our heart and very much within the realm of sincerity (I'm one of the few who don't regard sincerity as a "sin"), to clarify ourselves in the midst of the chaos and noise around us (much of it intentional), at the same time as we're expressing it, we're dodging the chaos that arises as a sort of feedback, like speaking into a microphone that's way too hot on the mixing board, and being picked up by the stage monitors? This kind of feedback though is conscious and a choice by those who have chosen to pervey chaos as their social contribution to the fabric of social reality.
Most people who are familiar with it, especially professionals, have learned to accept it and have honed their ability to express with the impression of sincerity, while keeping their statements distant and detached enough to protect themselves. They're pros. They realize that its part of the nature of what they've chosen to do for a living, so rather than conflict it, they navigate around it. Something that I find to be very worthy of respect and admiration, but in all honesty, its the farthest from my approach to life and this world of renown and infamy.
When I spoke in the two most recent posts, I spoke a balance between saving my own face, and the faces of those whom I'm trying to reach in a sincere manner without triggering the gremlins into attacking them, for lack of a better metaphor.
You know as well as I do, that a most vocal and aggressive percentage of the audience in the vicinity of 5% to 10%, are only watching, listening or reading, because they believe that the people who have the courage to speak up in front of a crowd, don't have their own consciousness, are just puppets of other people who have real consciousness, or are simply mirrors whose better aspects are only a reflection of that 5% to 10% of their audience who believe that kind of nonsense. For artists and other creators, their first lesson in life is most likely one that hardens them up enough to overcome that barrier of the kind of people who are in this business because they like to express their heart. They've found a way to deal with it amicably, and without confronting it directly. I on the other hand, have for whatever reason, chosen not to bend or break to it, and never to allow it to gain its due, because honestly, its due nothing. More proof that those other artists and creators who get onto this stage, are very admirable, especially compared to my attitudes in this regard, though in my defense, I'm just as protective of my own audience minus that 5% to 10% who make up the most vocal and chaotic part.
Sometimes, that 5% to 10%, can have an impact upon your life that adds up to quite a bit more than their sum, at the cost of your moments of life, and over the last twenty to thirty years, that effect has only grown considerably. That 5% to 10% nowadays is the most vocal and aggressive part of an audience, and many who live that life on a stage that is presented before the audience and have seen that change, will know exactly what I'm talking about. Kudos to them however, for being true professionals and keeping their couth and dignity through it all. They're truly worthy of the adoration of that other 90% of their fans, amongst whom I number.
So, my statement about being someone who is somewhat mysterious, and in the public eye, though largely obscured by controversy or even just the pure simplicity of life's tapestry, each of us finding our way into places and situations that somehow challenge us in the most frustrating of ways, and the fact that there is a woman (or two) who is of some wealth and fame, who might have in a roundabout way nodded in my direction, though without the pressure to follow through, but rather in a "welcome to the circus" sort of fashion.
Just from knowing this life and having become accustomed to it for two decades now, but never achieving the kind of financial success I'd hoped, but certainly having arrived at a sort of infamy and underground sensation, though not as someone experiencing the life experiences of someone else, and believing it to be my own (that group lays with the 5% to 10% of narcissists). A sort of life philosophy that arises from people who've seen the movie Blade Runner, and quickly discover the metaphor between replicants as being false people who remember other people's lives and believe those memories to be their own, and then use that realization to subjugate the people they classify in that way. NPC syndrome as they call it nowadays. I don't think that was Philip K. Dick's intent, for his book: Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? to be weaponized in that way, any more than J.D. Salinger didn't intend for his book: The Catcher in the Rye, to be a significant aspect of the psychology of the man who shot John Lennon. For these authors to watch important social and philosophical insights they provided us with, to eventually become part of some monstrous perversity a great distance from where they'd intended them to be. Perverse, meaning, their having strayed from the guiding light their authors might have hoped for them. Its hard to justify the darkness of shadow work, even in words, when murder and death is involved, despite the fact that I truly believe we learn from both our darkness and our light.
My impression and experience of this awareness, of my place amongst some of the people I've alluded to, in my recent posts, was not meant to belittle them, as if I was somehow saying that women with money do not, and are not capable of having a heart, because they very much are, and most who are in that position have been hardened up by life to be able to handle the pressures required to maintain that kind of an empire. So many people employed by your resources, so long as you're still the marketable product you've long since become.
Even in modest situations of millions, that kind of pressure, and you begin to realize that you aren't the tyrant at the top, crushing under foot those fortunate enough to be in your presence and employ. You're riding a wave whose energy and momentum remains as long as you're marketable. The people employed beneath you, are a part of that wave, and you're doing your best to figure out where its going, and to make your next move marketable so as to maintain that momentum, and the jobs of all the people employed by you as the product. They know that, and I know that its lonely. Very lonely. And the thing that lonely people want most of all, is to find someone who they believe understands them, that they can get together and share that, and for the rest of the world to disappear for a few hours, while they enjoy the fact that they weren't alone as they thought they were.
That fantasy grows in every single one of us who experiences or understands that aspect of these things, and it can become our Achilles heel, especially in the hands of people who'd find their way in on that same fantasy.
Part of our journey was becoming familiar with the fact that there would be people who'd play us that exact way. That our longing in the long run, if we weren't careful, would become our greatest weakness.
I'm glad I took the time to clarify this today, because the way I left it yesterday, was in words that were halfway trying to address exactly what I am saying today, and at the same time, doing battle with the forces of chaos, and doing my best not to become fierce about it. Once you lose that control over your emotions, you're biasing the people that you least want to have any bias at all. So yesterday, I was dealing with both sides, and trying to get to the heart of the matter, and ended up making a mess of it.
I think that the greatest gift of realization, has been the realization that even though it has been a very long time since I've had the chance to express my heart in a sensually physical way, that realizing there are others who have come to this same realization, but maybe at great distances, that I'm not alone, and that neither are you.
Before climbing this mountain, I was fortunate enough to have had the love of my life, more than once, and my sense of admiration for women in that position, who are riding the crest of a wave as visionaries, trying to determine where the market forces will be in a decade in order to best preserve their legacy and the employ of those whose made a living under their vision. To know that we share the same kind of loneliness, is to realize that we're not alone at all. What I'd give to make the rest of the world disappear for a few hours for us to be alone and together and able to express that.
I'm sure that we have fond memories like that, with others who've truly held our hearts in theirs, and it isn't dementia to entertain these ideas in order to stave off the loneliness of this often bizarre world the future has become. Or to deal with those who believe us to be their mirrors. That somehow all of our creativity spawns forth every time they send us an email or text message, as if that somehow contains their soul and creative energy, that is making us capable of such things. That's real narcissism by the way and I'm sure that the people I'm trying to address in a positive and helpful manner certainly can relate. You create something, then ten minutes later you get an opportunistic email from omeone that almost never speaks to you or contacts you, conveniently timed after you've created your work, and sent to you just before you release it. Its kind of like how dogs pee on trees to mark their territory, so that other dogs know whose territory it is? They want other people to believe that your creativity originates from the dog that pees on you just before you release something.
My point yesterday was not that money makes one heartless. My point was that sometimes when we're seeking something we believe we desperately need, we're making ourselves vulnerable. Not necessarily to a solitary person who'd exploit the situation for their own financial gain, but to that 5% to 10% who in addition to their abilities of chaos, are able to look into and read situations (and our psyche like mind readers), enough so to become the trojan horse that exploits us or even destroys us.
The Odyssey is very much a current subject given the controversy and fanfare of the film, and I couldn't think of a better way to express the ideas that I believe are at the heart of the Iliad, though I'd prefer to stay away from colour symbolism (most would automatically and reflexively imply blue white in association with the Odyssey, given its Greek origins and blue white can and often is socially weaponized in so many ways). I'm sticking with my Shhhh! Digital Media colours which are visible at the header on the top of this web page.
How many people can you count in your own circle, who truly believe that you are you? How many of those other people believe that you're just some mechanical prop that looks like the person of your own history, but is nothing more than a thing rather than a human being? That believe that you're some automaton that produces content every time they send you an input, believing themselves to be the source of everything you do. All those people who call your number, none of whom you know, and leave no message, send an email after never speaking with you, thinking their imprint upon you is somehow marking you as their property or as your source. Narcissists I mean.
I remember having a girlfriend whom after we consumated our relationship on New Years, she went on to produce poetry and artwork, but I recall never once regarding myself as the source of it. It was more like I was fortunate to be a part of something with her, because she would have created that are with me, or without me, but maybe not expressing the exact same sentiments. Most flowers bloom not because of us, but regardless. We're fortunate if we're near them when they do. Some people though, they look at creativity, inspiration and output very possessively. As if the inspired creators throughout the world wouldn't function without them as a source. How can anyone truly appreciate someone else, if all they see in others is themselves.
You're not alone, and this is a war I intend to win, and without violence. I have an innate ability to piece things together very quickly, empathically and intuitively. I find it cruel and unimaginable that circumstances within one's own head and heart, could produce such people as these 5% to 10% who see us this way. I say their head and their heart, because people such as those can in no way that I know of, have a spirit or soul, or mana, or essence, or whatever you prefer to call that aspect of us that goes on.
The only thing that I truly know, is that we're not alone and the proof of that is that we don't look at each other as if we're mirrors. We look at each other and see our true nature. Our uniqueness. I purposely drop clues to say hello every once in a while, and I catch them when you do too. It makes being part of the audience just as fun as being a creator.
Updates
Keep watching the website for the latest updates. They'll be on their way soon, but I can't promise exactly as to when. I can say that there will be a few of them coming soon.
PS:
Alicia Westin - Dinner at Kelsey's in 1999/2000. Very attractive, and modestly confident. Perpetual smiling eyes. I think the only time in my life that I actually made the proposal for a relationship. Many good memories, and a few painful ones for which I'm responsible.
Helayne Ying - Velvet Underground goth/alt.rock dance club in 2001. She arrived with big, professional hired security, who cleared the floor so that she and I could dance. Her first words to me: "You need to dance!", wearing a long white dress and with that unforgettable smile as she dragged me out onto the floor, her security keeping watch for us. Five years later, we met again under very different circumstances. She invited me to dinner on New Years, and wrote books filled with poetry about our time together there beyond. An Opera singer.
Myung Chung-Ae - A Korean woman with whom I had a growing friendship. She was developing a business plan and I lent her my laptop several times to develop her plan. One day we went out for coffee together, and we ended up in a conversation in which she gave reasons it would be good if we enjoyed each other's company in private, and I gave reasons it wouldn't be good. She won thankfully, and we began a secret and heated fling that lasted several months.
Aikiko Tanaka - Asahi Sushi, back between 2001 and 2003 where a Japanese waitress worked with whom I developed a friendship during business dinners I attended after work, even meeting her several times thereafter in a friendly capacity. Secretive. Attentive. Very intelligent and attractive. A cherished friendship that I wished could have been more.
Real memories for which I'm forever grateful. Painful however that all of these women were stalked by the group that plagues me, and in more than one case, were the reason we parted ways and for their safety.
I'm a secular atheist agnostic that leans toward Buddhism and Taoism and now to a degree, Shintoism. No blue church or brown church for me. Certainly, no blue roses either. I'm not a Zionist of any form, but I'm not against the rights of the Jewish or Muslim community. Most Zionism is about creating the casus belli for procuring land from other nations, or as a form of racial superiority over other cultures.
I'm Canadian by the way. I've never lived in the United States. I think that living anywhere likely has its benefits and challenges though, however the extremity to which they're apparent is definitely bound to their human rights code, their statutes and laws and how well they're protected in society, and more often than not, knowing the difference between when to enforce the spirit of the law or the letter of the law.
I am Brian Joseph Johns and this is Shhhh! Digital Media at https://www.shhhhdigital.com or https://www.shhhhdigital.ca in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at 200 Sherbourne Street Suite 701.
I'm Canadian Welsh, with European ancestry. I don't have brown eyes, I don't have blue eyes. My name is not Trent, though Trent Reznor is pretty darn awesome. We share an instrument and extensive history with MIDI and samplers in common.
I am Brian Joseph Johns and this is Shhhh! Digital Media at https://www.shhhhdigital.com or https://www.shhhhdigital.ca in Toronto, Ontario, Canada at 200 Sherbourne Street Suite 701.
![]() |
| Click image for contact information... |
